Applying the doctrine of justification by faith: Romans 3:27-31
The doctrines of the Bible, its
teaching, are the word of God. They are
true and are worthy to be held for no other reason than that. They are revealed to us by God through men
inspired by the Holy Spirit, and it would be insane for us to refuse to believe
what God has himself made known to us. And
it seems reasonable to assume that God has not revealed inconsequential truths
to us. Deut. 29:29 is relevant here:
“The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things that are revealed
belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this
law.” God has given us his word so that
we may do something with it, namely, obey it and put it into practice in
our lives.
For that reason, when we look at
the unfolding of the gospel in Romans 3, we should not think that this is
unimportant or irrelevant. However,
there are right ways of holding doctrine and there are wrong ways of holding
doctrine. What the apostle does here
shows us how doctrine of justification by faith ought to work in the life of a
believer.
He shows us, for example, that
this doctrine does not just dangle on its own.
It ought to have a profound affect upon the way we think and live. If we hold this truth as something merely
interesting on a theoretical level, then we have failed to see the gospel for
what it truly is. The problem is that a
lot of people see this sharp dichotomy between doctrine and practice. But the apostle would have abhorred all such
categories. The foundation for Biblical
practical living is the doctrine the theology of the Bible. This ought to have a profound impact upon the
ways we face each day and interact with others.
As we move through the passage, we will consider some more concrete ways
we should do this, but for now I just want to make this observation. Doctrine implies holiness of life. This is the point of the opening words of the
text: “What then?”
So what specifically is Paul
doing here? Having elaborated the
doctrine of justification by faith, he now draws three inferences from it. The inferences are that (1) justification by
faith promotes humility by excluding boasting, (2) it promotes missions by removing distinctions, and (3) it promotes holiness by upholding the law.
These issues were of particular
concern in Paul’s day, especially in terms of the interaction between the
church and the Jewish community.
Remember that Paul generally began his evangelistic efforts in the
synagogue. And moreover, he defines the
gospel in this very letter as that which has Jewish priority: it is the gospel
“to the Jews first.” They are God’s
historic covenant people. So it is not
merely a matter of missional convenience to address their concerns; it was a
matter of theological fidelity to do so.
And so the apostle wants his Jewish family to see that the gospel does
not invalidate faithfulness to God’s own word in the law. That is essentially what he is doing here;
there is nothing in the gospel which is fundamentally contrary to the law of
God. Indeed, the law is upheld by the
very gospel that Paul proclaims.
Let’s consider each implication
in turn.
The gospel promotes humility
by excluding boasting
“Then what becomes of our
boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? By a law of works? No, but by the law of faith. For we hold that one is justified by faith
apart from works of the law” (27-28). We
might not normally think of the OT in terms of the prohibition of boasting, but
the emphasis in it on the dangers of pride, which is everywhere, especially in
the wisdom literature, illustrates the fact that what Paul is doing here is
showing that the tendency of the gospel message is not in a different direction
from the OT. “For though the LORD is
high, he regards the lowly, but the haughty he knows from afar” (Ps.
139:6). Of the seven abominations that
Solomon mentions in Proverbs 6, “haughty eyes” are first on the list (Prov.
6:16-17). And then there is that great
word in the prophesy of Isaiah: “For thus says the One who is high and lifted
up, who inhabits eternity, whose name is Holy: ‘I dwell in the high and holy
place, and also with him who is of a contrite and lowly spirit, to revive the
spirit of the lowly, and to revive the heart of the contrite” (Isa.
57:15). So here we see that the message
of the gospel is in keeping with this emphasis in OT. The two are compatible in terms of this
spirit of humility which is promoted in both.
Now it’s probable that Paul’s
main reason here in pointing this out is to undermine the pretense for pride in
some of his Jewish brethren, who looked on the Gentiles with disdain. Apparently some Jews found a reason for
boasting in the law, by interpreting it as a law of works. That is, they saw the law as a way to merit
the favor of God by their law-keeping.
Of course, if you have merited the favor of God, then that means that
you are better than those who haven’t, and that gives you a ground for
boasting. The apostle will come back to
this in 4:1-5. There he will say that
Abraham didn’t having anything to boast about since he was justified by faith
and not by works: “Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a
gift but as his due. And to the one who
does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is
counted as righteousness” (4:4-5).
This emphasis on works-righteousness
therefore put the law-keeper at odds with the requirement for humility before
God. But the apostle says that the
gospel undermines this. Why? Because the gospel is not a law of works but
a law of faith (or “principle of faith”: here I think the apostle is using the
word law metaphorically in terms of a principle). Though Paul’s Jewish brethren thought they
were keeping the law by opposing the gospel, the apostle shows that actually
the gospel preserves the very spirit of the OT better than themselves.
In opposition to
works-righteousness or salvation by merit, the gospel tells us that we can only
be make right, not by looking to ourselves but by looking away from ourselves
to Christ. We are “justified by faith
apart from works of the law.” Thus there
is no room for boasting in yourself.
For you can’t boast in yourself if you are not looking at yourself or
trusting in yourself.
The emphasis here upon humility
and the exclusion of boasting is important for a number of reasons. For one thing, it’s just the truth about who
we are and what we can do. To fail to
humble ourselves before God is to live in a delusion. We do not receive salvation because we earned
it; we receive it as beggars. In fact, the way God saves people underlines the
fact that he alone is the one who ought to receive the glory (1 Cor. 1:26-31).
We need to be reminded of this because this is not just a Jewish problem, it’s
a human problem. As John Stott puts it,
“all human beings are inveterate boasters.
Boasting is the language of our fallen self-centeredness.” Paul had already written to the Christians in
Corinth who loved to boast in their wisdom, “For who sees anything different in
you? What do you have that you did not
receive? If then you received it, why do
you boast as if you did not receive it?” (1 Cor. 4:7). Every boast is a denial of grace and a brick
in our own Tower of Babel of pride and achievement. Better to knock it down than to have God
humble us: “Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall”
(Prov. 16:18).
Another reason this is important
is because the reason we exist is to glorify God. But we cannot live lives that glorify God if
we are boasting about ourselves: these are incompatible modes of living. Either you live for the glory of God or you
live for yourself; you cannot do both.
This is the point of the Isaiah passage we referred to earlier. God dwells in two places: he dwells in the
high and lofty place and he dwells with those who are lowly and contrite. In other words, God does not dwell with those
who worship themselves. Rather, God
seeks those who worship him (Jn. 4:24).
And this leads us to a third
reason. If God made you to worship him,
it is futile to seek true fulfillment in any other way. In other words, if you want to be truly
happy, don’t live for yourself; worship God.
Now this is not to say that there aren’t plenty of people out there who
are perfectly content without God. I
don’t deny that there are. However, to
use C. S. Lewis’ analogy, it is also possible to be perfectly content making
mud pies in the slums because you don’t have any idea what is meant by the
offer of a holiday at the sea. In fact,
however, we know by experience that the best way to become a miserable person
is to become fixated on yourself. I like the way John Piper put it once: to worship yourself is like going to the Alps
and then locking yourself in a room full of mirrors. Everyone knows what it means to be “taken out
of yourself,” to experience something transcendent as the way to experience
something truly delightful and wonderful.
But the one who transcends every category of wonder and beauty and power
and wisdom is God himself. Everything
else that we worship can only be a faint image of the God who made it. If we refuse to worship him, we are only
robbing ourselves of the purest and best and lasting joy. And it is the reason idolatry is not only
wicked, but pathetic and heartbreaking.
Pride is dangerous because it is
the root of so many evils. It is the
root of selfishness because it puts oneself before others. It is the root of unforgiveness because it
blinds us to our own need for mercy. It
the root of lust and covetousness because it makes us think that we deserve
better than what we have. It is the root
of anger because we fail to see that the people who annoy us are less important
than people themselves. And on and on.
This means that if we kill
boasting, we will inevitably become better people: more forgiving, more
sacrificial, more loving, more longsuffering, and more contented. Isn’t this the kind of person you want to
become? The only path to it is the path
of humility.
And the gospel is the only sure
path to humility. Again, I want to point
out that I’m not saying there aren’t humble people out there who don’t believe
the gospel. We should expect that there
would be since all men and women are made in the image of God whether they are
saved or not. However, I do want to
point out that secularism, which is the clearest alternative to the gospel here
in the West, gives you no reason to be humble (despite protests to the
contrary). For secularism has no place
for the grace and mercy of God. The only
salvation it knows is a salvation that man bestows upon himself. And that being the case, the secular mind has
every reason to boast and pride. Secularism
has no argument against despising those who are different than yourself. Secularism gives no reason to show grace to
those who are not in its tribe. The
gospel, on the other hand, says, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” whether that
neighbor is a conservation or liberal, white or black, Christian or non, your
spouse or your enemy. Why? Because we are saved by a love that we didn’t
deserve and which we received, not by merit, but by faith alone.
But that’s not the only inference
the apostle draws out.
The gospel promotes missions
by removing distinctions
“Or is God the God of the Jews
only? Is he not of the Gentiles
also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since God
is one – who will justify the circumcision by faith and the uncircumcised
through faith” (3:29-30). Another
emphasis in the OT is the emphasis on the world-wide extent of the blessing of
Abraham: “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Gen.
12:3). However, the Jewish exclusivism
that plagued Paul’s nation lost sight of this facet of the blessing of
Abraham. Salvation is not just for the
Jews but also for the Gentiles since God is the God of both. Unlike the false gods of the nations, the God
of Israel is not just a tribal deity, but the God of the whole earth.
However, when Paul says that God
is the God of the Jews and Gentiles, I think what he is saying is that God is
the God who saves Gentiles as well as Jews. Yes, God is the God of all men in terms of
creation. But sometimes when God says to
people, “I am your God,” what he means is that he is for them in a saving
way. This, surely, is the point of the
New Covenant (Jer. 31:33), and what lies behind Rev. 21:3, “And I heard a loud
voice from the throne saying, ‘Behold the dwelling place of God is with
man. He will dwell with them, and they
will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God.” So the apostle is arguing here that God saves
Jew and Gentile. This is, of course, in
complete agreement with the message of the OT.
The apostle is saying that the
gospel proves that God saves both Jew and Gentile because salvation –
justification – is not a matter of law-keeping but rather a matter of faith. By wrongly emphasizing the law – both its
ceremonial and moral aspects – the Jews had made salvation a matter for Jews
only. The only way to be saved was to be
part of the people of God which they defined solely in terms of belonging to
Israel and that meant obeying the law of Moses.
However, in doing so they actually ended up running contrary to the
actual teaching of both the law and the prophets. Salvation, even in the OT, is not seen as
only for Israel but for all the nations.
The gospel, on the other hand, maintains this balanced perspective.
Salvation is available for all
because justification is not offered to us on the basis of law-keeping but on
the basis of faith. Neither Jew nor
Gentile could keep the law as the basis of acceptance with God. But faith opens a door through which all may
go in.
And this means that the gospel is
a gospel for all the world. The word for
“Gentiles” is the word for “nations.”
The gospel is a gospel for the nations (cf. Matt. 29:18-20). Of course, it begins with those around us
here at home. We ought to be a light so
that those around us can see the gospel in our lives and hear it from our
lips. But we don’t stop there: we go on
to help those who are bringing the gospel into all the world and to take it
there ourselves if God so allows us to go.
The gospel is not something for us to hold on to; it is something for us
to share and if we are unwilling to do that, it means that we have missed
something very fundamental to the gospel.
There is another way to look at
this as well. To believe the gospel
means that we do not see our particular tribe to more favored than others in
terms of our worthiness before God. It
means that we do not look down on others or maintain a posture of
superiority. For God is not the God of the
Jews only, but also of everyone else. We
are not saved because our upbringing was better than someone else’s. We are not saved because of our education. We are not saved because we aren’t as bad as
the next person. Justification by faith
rules that out completely. To accept
this doctrine means that we accept the fact that we cannot save ourselves, that
we are not good enough. That cuts out
racism, and it cuts out snobbery of any kind.
It makes us approachable and empathetic people. That is to say, it makes us more like our
Savior.
Now I’m not saying that a
Christian can’t be a patriot or love his country. I’m not saying that a Christian can’t
appreciate aspects of his heritage and culture and upbringing. But what I am saying is that if we have truly
embraced the gospel, we don’t make these things barriers for bringing the
gospel to others or welcoming others into our lives. Rather, we follow our Savior by welcoming the
outcasts and the marginalized and loving them with the love of our Savior – who
loves us with a love that is both infinitely to be desired and yet complete
undeserved.
This brings us to our final
point.
The gospel promotes holiness
by upholding the law
Finally, the apostle concludes by
saying, “Do we then overthrow the law by this faith? By no means!
On the contrary, we uphold the law” (31). Now the first question here is, what does
Paul mean by “the law”? Because a lot of people read
that and just think Paul is talking about the boundary markers like
circumcision and the like, which distinguished Jew from Gentile. However, as Tom Schreiner points out, “law” in
Paul regularly refers to the commands of the Mosaic institution. Though some of these are boundary markers,
most of them have to do with living before a holy God and which are applicable
to Gentile as well as Jew. The argument
against the gospel would have been that it led to antinomianism and licentiousness. For if we are saved simply by faith, what
need have we for holiness before God?
Paul answers by saying that “we
uphold the law.” What does he mean by
that? How does the gospel uphold the
law? Though Paul does not give a
complete answer here, I believe he does address this later on, especially in
chapters 6-8, and this indicates what the apostle meant.
First, he surely meant that faith
in Christ incompatible with a life in sin.
This is certainly what he is getting at in Romans 6. Faith upholds the law by enabling the
Christian to live under the grace of God which empowers us to truly fight the
sin in our hearts. Faith empowers
obedience. Faith is not an excuse for
sin but the freedom to truly fight it for the first time. We need to remember that the apostles didn’t
just preach faith, but faith and repentance, for you cannot have one without
the other.
The irony is that the law itself
gives no power for obedience. Faith
actually gives us the power to be law-keepers: not in the sense of keeping the
law for the purpose of meriting God’s favor out of fear, but for keeping it for
the purpose of pleasing the One who saved us out of love. Faith upholds the law; the law can’t uphold
itself.
Another way that faith upholds
the law is by pointing us to the one who fulfills the law in every jot and
tittle (Mt. 5:17-18). Yes, there are
aspects of the law that no longer apply, but the reason they don’t apply is
because they are fulfilled in Christ.
For example, we don’t sacrifice goats because Christ is our
sacrifice. In this way, the law is not
abolished but fulfilled.
He also fulfilled God’s moral law
by expiating the sin that brought the just wrath of God against us (Rom.
3:25-26). God’s law has thus not been
done away; it has received notice it deserves, being fulfilled by Christ for us
and by the Holy Spirit in us.
So let me ask you: has the
doctrine of justification by faith made a difference in your life? Has it made a difference in your
relationships? Recently, I had the
privilege to officiate at Jacob and Stephanie’s wedding, and this is one of the
things I said to them: “Let the gospel transform your marriage into one in
which forgiveness is freely given and received.
To believe in the doctrine of justification by faith alone in Christ
alone on the basis of grace alone and not to have a gentle and forbearing and
longsuffering and forgiving spirit is a shocking contradiction. To not extend forgiveness to our spouse is to
forget that we were purged from our sins.
So preach the gospel to yourselves, preach it to each other, live it out,
and you will find a pleasure in your marriage that is unattainable outside of
fellowship with Christ. Let the
fragrance of the gospel sweeten your marriage and your love for each other.” Indeed, let the fragrance of the gospel
sweeten every aspect of our lives and adorn the doctrine of God our Savior in
all things (Tit. 2:10).
Comments
Post a Comment