Christ the Bridegroom and New Beginning: Matthew 9:14-17
I’ve often wondered why
Belshazzar feasted when the Persians were at the gates of Babylon. I’ve often wondered why the high priests and
religious leaders in Jesus’ day were so concerned to keep themselves ceremonially
pure when they were conspiring to kill the Messiah. But it’s really just all a matter of a loss
of perspective, a blurred vision that is the result of sin, that causes people
to see things upside down and out of focus.
How do you keep a proper
perspective? We often hear the advice:
“The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.” I agree, but I would add that God is the main thing. To put anything else as the main thing is
idolatry. But more than that, it is to
put light and fluffy trivialities in the place deep and weighty realities. So it is not only sinful, it is stupid. It is to do what Stephen Curtis Chapman wrote
about in his song, “See the Glory:”
I’m playing Gameboy standing in
the middle of the Grand Canyon
I’m eating candy sittin’ at a gourmet feast
I’m wading in a puddle when I
could be swimming in the ocean
Tell me what’s the deal with me
(I know the time has come for me to)
Wake up and see the glory
the middle of the Grand Canyon
I’m eating candy sittin’ at a gourmet feast
I’m wading in a puddle when I
could be swimming in the ocean
Tell me what’s the deal with me
(I know the time has come for me to)
Wake up and see the glory
We confess that Jesus Christ the
Son of God. He is the glory. He is, as the apostle Paul put it to the
Colossians, “the image of the invisible God, the firstborn [i.e. the preeminent
one] of every creature” (1:16), and “in him dwelleth all the fullness of the
Godhead bodily” (2:9). Or, as Hebrews
1:3 puts it, Jesus is the “brightness of his [the Father’s] glory, and the
express image of his person,” and he upholds “all things by the word of his
power.” There is no way to get around
the apostle John’s conclusion: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
with God, and the Word was God” (Jn. 1:1).
Scientists are blown away by the magnitude of the universe and by the
power exhibited in it through stars and supernovas. But what the poet said about dogs and cats
applies equally to stars and supernovas: “the Good Lord made them all.” He is infinitely greater than the greatest
display of beauty and power and wonder and awe in the universe. After all, he is the architect of such beauty
and power and wonder and awe. The
creator is greater than the creature.
We need to meditate upon these
things. We need to remember who Jesus
Christ is. We need to think about his
power and his glory, what he has done and what he is doing even now. “Remember the wondrous works that he has
done, his miracles, and the judgments he uttered” (Ps. 105:5). And we need to think on these things because
doing so helps us to keep a proper perspective.
We need to be reminded of Grand Canyon realities so that we don’t
fritter our lives away in ultimately meaningless trifles. I don’t want to end up a spiritual Baron Von
Schlieffen, who when one of his staff officers pointed out the beauty of the
sun reflecting off a river, looked briefly and coldly at it and then replied,
“An unimportant obstacle.” I don’t want
to become like that. I don’t want to die
to beauty, and especially I don’t want to die to the One from whom and in whom all
true beauty is to be found: the Triune God.
And I’m convinced this is why
Matthew is writing his Gospel. He is not
writing this just to give us details about the biography of Jesus. He is writing this to tell us about the glory
of the Son of God. He is writing this to
encourage faith in him, joy in him, and obedience to him. As we’ve looked through miracle after miracle,
we’ve seen more of Jesus Christ, who he is and what he can do for weak and
sinful men and women.
That goes for the passage in
front of us as well. These verses, in
which our Lord deals with the disciples of John the Baptist over a question of
fasting, also point us to who Jesus is.
That is, they are not meant primarily to sort out this question of
fasting, though I don’t doubt that they do that. We looked at them from that perspective when
we considered Matthew 6:16-18. And we
noted that John Piper has called these verses the most important word in the
New Testament on the issue of fasting.
They teach us that in the period of time between the ascension of Christ
and his return in glory, the church will have times of fasting (Mt. 9:15).
But these words of Christ go
beyond the question of fasting, and open another window onto the meaning of his
coming into the world. In particular, he
reveals two things about himself in these verses. First of all, he reveals that he is the
Bridegroom. That is very significant. I don’t think he was just looking for a good
illustration of a joyful time, and a wedding feast met that end. Rather, this tells us something about
Jesus. Secondly, these words tell us
that Jesus by his coming into the word has brought about a new beginning, a new
age. So these are not idle words. This is not just about fasting. This is about Jesus, pointing us to who he
is, just as these miracle stories in Matthew 8-9 have been doing.
But before we look at what these
words have to tell us about our Lord, we need to consider the implicit warning
which lies in these verses. Here were
men, well-intentioned no doubt, who were totally upset over this whole question
of fasting. They were so upset that they
had to accost Jesus over it. In other
words, they were totally consumed by these external religious observations, and
when someone didn’t follow them in it, it annoyed and disturbed them. And there are people like that. And many times the reason they are like this
is because they don’t understand what real, internal religion is; they don’t
know what it means to have a relationship with the living God, and so they
obsess over externals. Now that doesn’t
mean that disciplines like fasting are not important; our Lord teaches that
they are. But the warning inherent here
is that we have to be careful that we don’t neglect our heart because we are
satisfied with ritual. There are people
who know how to read their Bibles, go to church, and pray; but these are
rituals to them, and they know nothing about the reality of walking with the
living God in a real relationship. And
so they get upset when you don’t do things the way they do it. And that’s what was happening here.
And of course our Lord deals with
their questions brilliantly. He not only
answers their question, but points them to the truth about himself, which is
what they really needed to see. John the
Baptist pointed people to Jesus; perhaps these disciples had not heeded his
teaching well enough. Our Lord corrects
that by teaching them these important things about himself.
First of all, Jesus tells us that
he is the Bridegroom (15). The occasion
for this was this question from the disciples of John (14). At this time, John was in prison (4:12), and
perhaps some of John’s disciples blamed Jesus for not doing anything about
it. So perhaps they were already a
little disgruntled at Jesus. But they
also followed their master’s ascetic life (11:18), and here they are blaming
Jesus for not doing so (cf. 11:19).
In this they were followed by the
Pharisees, who fasted twice a week (evidently, according to John Gill, on
Mondays and Thursdays). Now this was not
commanded by the Old Testament, which only required Israelites to fast on the
Day of Atonement; these were voluntary fasts that had become more or less a
standard sign of good spirituality by Jesus’ day. But they had become so standard that any
deviation from these fasts was taken by many as a sure sign of a lesser
spirituality. The Pharisees couldn’t
understand why Jesus would hang out with sinful people; the disciples of John
couldn’t understand why Jesus would not require his disciples to follow the
rigorous fast schedule of John the Baptist and of the Pharisees.
To this our Lord responds: “Can
the children of the bridechamber [i.e. wedding guests] mourn as long as the
bridegroom is with them?” The obvious
answer to this question is, no. You
don’t fast at a wedding. But the
interesting thing is why Jesus chose this particular illustration. One reason could be that John the Baptist had
already used this illustration with regard to Jesus, and since Jesus is
speaking to his disciples, he reminds them of it. In John 3:28-30, John the Baptist says, “Ye
yourselves bear me witness, that I said, I am not the Christ, but that I am
sent before him. He that hath the bride
is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth
him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice: this my joy therefore
is fulfilled.” Here, John likens himself
to the best man with Jesus as the groom.
John rejoiced at Jesus’ coming.
This is not a time of fasting, but a time of rejoicing.
But even so, this was still
shocking, because in the OT God is
the groom and the husband of Israel. For
Jesus to say he is the groom, the
husband of the new people of God, can only mean that he is taking to himself
what to the OT prophets belonged only to God.
For example, the prophet Isaiah wrote, “For thy Maker is thine husband;
the LORD of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God
of the whole earth shall he be called” (Isa. 54:5). Later, Isaiah repeats this image of God as
the husband of Israel: “As the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, so shall
thy God rejoice over thee” (Isa. 62:5).
Of course, we all know that the whole story of Hosea revolves around
this image of God as the husband of a wayward bride, the people of Israel. So when Jesus identifies himself with the
bridegroom, he is doing more than evoking a useful illustration of a happy
time. He is identifying himself with the
God of Israel.
The NT picks up on this. To the Corinthians, Paul writes, “For I am
jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband,
that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ” (2 Cor. 11:2). And to the Ephesians, he writes that the
mystery of the oneness of husband and wife points ultimately to the
relationship that Christ has with the church (cf. Eph. 5:32). In Revelation 19:7, the church is pictured as
the Lamb’s wife.
But in describing himself in this
way, Jesus is not just identifying himself with the God of Israel, he is also
telling us how he relates to his people, the church. Jesus is the perfect husband to a very
imperfect bride. “What the bridegroom is
to the bride, the Lord Jesus is to the souls of all who believe in him” (J. C.
Ryle). And this is demonstrated most
clearly in his undying, sacrificial love for them. “Husbands, love your wives even as Christ
also loved the church, and gave himself for it” (Eph. 5:25). My dad was a medic in the army during the
Vietnam War, and he has told me that when he was at Fort Sam Houston, he would
see wives of mangled veterans look at the torn bodies of their husbands, and
then shocked by what they saw pull off their wedding rings, turn around and
leave. But Jesus Christ didn’t marry a
perfect bride. His bride was already
mangled and disfigured from sin. And yet
he gave up the glories of heaven for a time to suffer unspeakable misery and
death in order to win her for himself.
“For ye know that grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was
rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be
rich” (2 Cor. 8:9).
It is good to remember this
because we sometimes wonder if Jesus really loves us especially when we are
going through a crisis. Have we not
doubted God because we have experienced tragedy? I’m not going to even pretend that I can
answer the question, “Why?” when you go through tragedy. But let us point every doubt and every
question to the cross of Jesus Christ. On
the cross, we can see that Jesus Christ without question loves those for whom
he died. He loves his bride, the
church. He loves every believer, no
matter how great or small their achievements in the faith. The cross is the proof of that. He is the shepherd who gives his life for the
sheep.
But his love is not just a dying
love, like that of a Romeo or Juliet.
His love is a conquering love.
Paul goes on to say to the Ephesians, in describing Christ’s love for
his people, that he died so “that he might sanctify and cleanse it [the church]
with the washing of water by the word, that he might present it to himself a
glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it
should be holy and without blemish” (Eph. 5:26-27). He gave his life so that they might have
life. In his death, he has purchased for
us something far more breathtaking and precious than a life here without
pain. He has given us the privilege to
be presented before the king of the universe holy and without blemish.
A few verses later, in telling
husbands how to love their wives, the apostle writes, “For no man ever yet
hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the
church” (Eph. 5:29). He loves the church
by nourishing and cherishing it. He
supplies all our needs. He forgives all
our sins. He sympathizes with us in our
troubles. He does not reject us for a
few weaknesses. He considers his church
to be one with him. Those who persecute
the church persecute Christ (cf. Acts 9:5).
Though the earthly life of our
Lord ended in his crucifixion, nevertheless it was a time of joy that he had
come. His death meant the redemption of
the church his bride, the eternal salvation of every soul that believes.
Now it is true that in the
interim, in the time between our Lord’s leaving this world for glory and his
return, that there are times when it is appropriate to fast and mourn. But the tears we weep are nevertheless tears
of joy because the day will come when he does return. It was right to rejoice and not fast in the
presence of the bridegroom. And it is
right to mourn and fast in his absence.
But the hope of every believer is that the time is coming when we will
once again be in his presence. And that
will be forever. There is coming a day
when there will be no more fasting, no more mourning, no more crying, because
we will be in the presence of the Son of God forever. One of my favorite NT prayers in the one from
Jude 24-25: “Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present
you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, to the only
wise God our Savior, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and
forever. Amen.”
Our Lord goes on to follow up the
wedding analogy with a parable (16-17).
But this parable goes beyond the particular situation of fasting. The basic point it this: our Lord has come to
inaugurate a new era, and the old forms of Judaism (including how it did
fasting) cannot be poured into the new forms initiated by Jesus. The kingdom that Jesus was building was not
just a continuation of the old kingdoms of Judah and Israel; there was a
definite newness to it.
To illustrate this, he uses the
analogy of patches (16) and wineskins (17).
You don’t put a patch of unshrunk cloth onto an old garment. The patch will shrink over time and make the
hole it was meant to patch even worse.
Nor do you put new wine into old wineskins. D. A. Carson explains: “Skin bottles for
carrying various fluids were made by killing the chosen animal, cutting off his
heat and feet, skinning the carcass, and sewing up the skin, fur side out, to
seal off all orifices but one (usually the neck). The skin was tanned with special care to
minimize disagreeable taste. In time the
skin became hard and brittle. If new
wine, still fermenting, were put into such an old skin, the buildup of
fermenting gases would split the brittle container and ruin both bottle and
wine. New wine was placed only in new
wineskins still pliable and elastic enough to accommodate the pressure.”[1] Jesus is likening the religious system
followed by both the Pharisees and the disciples of John to the old garments
and old wineskins. Jesus did not come
simply to carry on those traditions. He
came to introduce an entirely new situation, one that was ultimately
incompatible with the old ways of doing things.
Now what is this new situation
that Jesus was introducing? I think the
best way to put this is in the terms that the author of Hebrews uses when he
describes our Lord as “the mediator of the new covenant” (Heb. 9:15), which he
also calls a “better covenant” (cf. Heb. 7:22; 8:6). Better than what? Better than the old covenant (Heb. 8:7), one
which is decaying and waxing old and ready to vanish away (Heb. 8:13). What is the new covenant? The author of Hebrews, quoting the prophet
Jeremiah, tells us:
For this is the
covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the
Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I
will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people; and they shall not
teach every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord:
for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest. For I will be merciful to their
unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.
(8:10-12)
What makes this a new and better
covenant is just the fact that it is a successful covenant – the old one was
not (8:9). Whereas in the Old Covenant,
God laments that his law is not written on peoples’ hearts (Deut. 5:29), in
this covenant, he promises to write his law in the hearts of his people. That is what makes it successful. In the old covenant, God wrote his law on
tablets of stone. In the new covenant,
God writes his law on people’s hearts.
In the old covenant, God outwardly commands his law to people so that
they know it; in the new covenant, God inwardly commends his law to people so
that they do it.
Thus, the kingdom that Jesus is
building is primarily a spiritual kingdom.
To be a part of the old kingdom and covenant, you simply had to be born
into it. But to be a member of this
kingdom that Jesus is building, you have to be born again (cf. Jn. 3:1-8). Thus, though there is some continuity between
and old and new covenant in the sense that the former pointed to the latter,
there is a real discontinuity between the old and new covenant, and therefore
it cannot be seen simply as a continuation of old patterns followed by both the
Pharisees and the disciples of John.
Now we must be careful here. Some have taken our Lord’s language here, and
come to some wrong conclusions. One is
that people are saved differently under the new covenant than under the old
covenant, that the new situation our Lord was introducing was a different way
to be saved. Some older
dispensationalists claimed that under the old covenant people were saved by
their works, whereas in the church age, people are saved by grace. Now this is entirely wrong. People were saved under the old covenant by
grace not by works. In other words,
people under the old covenant were saved in virtue of the new covenant (cf.
Heb. 9:15). You see this primarily in
the examples of Abraham and David, who Paul says were both justified by faith,
not by works (Rom. 4:1-12).
The difference between the
covenants is not a difference in how people are saved. The difference is that the purpose of the old
covenant was primarily to point through external ordinances to the spiritual
kingdom and covenant that the Messiah would inaugurate. The old was the shadow; that new is the
reality. But because the old was
external, it was possible to be a member of the old covenant people of God
without being saved. However, the new
covenant people of God have all the privileges promised in that covenant; in
other words, the new covenant community consists of those who are born again,
justified, and who are being sanctified.
In that sense, it is successful, whereas the old was unsuccessful.
Should we not be thankful that
our Lord is the Mediator of this better covenant? Should we not be thankful that he came, not
just to show us how to fast, or how to exercise the spiritual disciplines, but
that by his death he has mediated a new covenant, a successful covenant, one
that guarantees the salvation of all who belong to him? “Wherefore he is able also to save them to
the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make
intercession for them” (Heb. 7:25).
Should we not rejoice that the one to whom all the shadows of OT
ordinances pointed has come? And should
we not therefore look for and long for the next step in the history of
redemption when God makes all things new through Jesus Christ?
In these words, therefore, behold
the Son of man and Son of God. He is the
bridegroom, and he came in love to her to purchase her redemption and her
marriage to himself. And by dying, he
sealed a new covenant, one that brings blessings far superior than those found
under the old covenant. Look to him this
morning, and find those blessings for yourself!
Comments
Post a Comment